NEU » pened. I thought the referee was in a good po

FIFA is suing some of its most senior former officials for damages of tens of millions of dollars.In legal papers filed in New York, FIFA says 41 former officials and marketing executives took bribes and stole money from footballs governing body. A legal source at FIFA says it could reclaim up to $190m (£135m).Those accused include Jack Warner, the former FIFA vice president and former CONCACAF president, Jeffrey Webb, the former FIFA vice president and former CONCACAF president and Chuck Blazer, the former CONCACAF general secretary. FIFA is suing some of its most senior former officials The legal papers also reveal FIFA believes South Africa paid a bribe of $10m (£7m) to win the right to host the 2010 World Cup. FIFA says the money was paid to Warner, Blazer and a third executive committee member. The money went through FIFAs accounts and was disguised as development money for Caribbean football. Former vice president Jack Warner is among those accused by FIFA According to FIFA, it is now apparent that multiple members of the executive committee abused their positions and sold their votes on multiple occasions. Senior FIFA sources say the next two World Cups will definitely be held in Russia in 2018 and Qatar in 2022 even though it is now clear that the bidding and voting processes were corrupt. Chuck Blazer, former CONCACAF general secretary FIFA is confident its applications for damages filed in the Eastern District of New York Court on Tuesday will be successful. It says the returned money will be used for football development. In a statement, new FIFA president Gianni Infantino said: The defendants diverted this money not just from FIFA but from players, coaches and fans worldwide who benefit from the programmes that FIFA runs to develop and promote football. Jeffrey Webb, former FIFA vice president These dollars were meant to build football fields, not mansions and pools; to buy football kits, not jewellery and cars; and to fund youth player and coach development, not to underwrite lavish lifestyles for football and sports marketing executives.When FIFA recovers this money, it will be directed back to its original purpose, for the benefit and development of international football.The convicted defendants abused the positions of trust they held at FIFA and other international football organisations and caused serious and lasting damage to FIFA, its member associations and the football community. Gianni Infantino vows to recover stolen money for FIFA The monies they pocketed belonged to global football and were meant for the development and promotion of the game. FIFA as the world governing body of football wants that money back and we are determined to get it no matter how long it takes. Buy Yeezy Shoes . PETERSBURG, Fla. Yeezy Trainers Uk For Sale . 8 Kansas to a 64-63 win over Texas Tech on Tuesday night. The freshman from Vaughan, Ont. http://www.yeezytrainersuk.com/ . The Browns coaching search remains incomplete. Yeezy Boost Uk Shop . Halladay signed a one-day contract with the Toronto Blue Jays on Monday that allowed the veteran right-hander to retire as a member of team with which he broke into the majors and spent the bulk of his distinguished 16-year career. Adidas Yeezy For Sale Near Me . Hamelin, who triumphed in the 500 on Saturday, edged out Victor An of Russia by 0.021 seconds to maintain his lead in the World Cup standings. Russias Vladimir Grigorev was third. In the relay, Canada took control six laps from the finish line to beat Russia and the Netherlands.The FA is to take no further action following an off-the-ball incident between Saido Berahino and James McCarthy.The incident occurred during the first half of West Broms 1-0 victory over Everton on Saturday when Berahino was alleged to have kicked out at McCarthy.Everton boss Roberto Martinez was adamant the Albion striker should have been sent off, saying: The ball was stopped and Berahino just stamps on James McCarthy. I dont know what happened. I thought the referee was in a good position and should have seen that.dddddddddddd Its one of those naïve reactions and it should have been a red card.However, the FAs not-seen incident panel, made up of three former referees, has looked at the footage and was not unanimous on whether it constituted violent conduct, so no further action will be taken.Also See:West Brom videoWest Brom fixturesWest Brom statsGet ￡10 free bet ' ' '